Видео

Would love to see the company go under. Trust is something that’s very hard to earn and also very easy to lose and you lost it.

dislike

Congratulations on the lawsuit, here's to many more

What if you return adobe flash player in release date

turns out random RUclips videos aren't legally binding.

Throw the artists who helped you build your business under the bus to cater to the marketers who are fighting hard to realize George Orwell's vision. Artists don't need you and now you don't need artists. Marketers and Adobe- both scum.

You guys are not getting off the hook anymore. I'm guessing the FTC and the US Government have their fair share of good lawyers and they're saying you've been doing shady stuff for some time already. The industry standard is finally collapsing.

110K subs only 6K views that explain everything.

Caught on 4K. You cheaters I use only cracked version.

Hi Jessica, you should tell everyone if customers use things like the healing brush or generative fill those use the cloud and images have been flagged and reported. So stuff your sweet legalize where the sun don't shine. FU Adobe.

Find another job lady, Adobe is going to bankruptcy!

At 10 seconds her "we know" is as cringe and fake as Jason Levine's video on this

"Hey all, we at Adobe think that you are so stupid that you can't interpret our mandatory license agreement correctly. Here's a lawyer that can translate the big words to finger paintings to help you understand." Yeah that'll save you.

.... This is like the BP oil "Sorry" from South Park.

I've been using adobe products for 20+ years and just canceled my subscription. Feels great!

"Adobe doesn't own your content" "Adobe only gets to use all your content for free, forever, whenever and wherever Adobe wishes."

Sorry, Adobe. There isnt much you can do to bring me back at this point. Almost every part of using anything Adobe has been a nightmare, from payment to cancellation, to finding the right program bundle. Perpetual one time licenses couldn’t even bring me back at this point. This has gone on way too long and it’s time it ended. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

Pride for me means war against humanity, the laws of nature and therefore god. Pride also means the hope that Adobe gets Bud'lighted better sooner than later.

Ado-bye.

They will still make more by paying court cases and keeping things how they are instead of changing anything. They buy the people off that can make these loopholes linger for long periods of time legally. Even if 2 million people walked today, they'd still be laughing cause they still got you. THEY DONT CARE

Content aside, this video is so badly made.

I find it quite suspect that the adobe stock went up over 100 dollars in one day after the new TOS was announced and has been slowly rising since .. Its time to take a hard look at these investors , This has big brother government written all over it .. And this governemnt lawsuit is honestly just a distraction .. Im out forever.

So you say "We don’t train generative AI models on your content unless you choose to submit content to the Adobe Stock marketplace." But you also add into the Preferences/Photoshop Improvement Program the field "I give Adobe permission to use my images and associated data to train Adobe's generative AI models". If you were participating in this program... then this new option was also checked to on by default... but you didn't tell people did you!

Quit with weasel words. Everything should be opt in. Not opt out. Opt out should be the default. Plus you should not be the thought police. Plus TOS should be black and white and simple for the layperson to understand. Let’s face it you thought the customer would not find out and it failed spectacularly.

Looking ahead, I think we should all be concerned that the government is using tech companies like Adobe to monitor our lives without a warrant and without our knowledge. They always say they are protecting us from something. Currently they say it's child material, but it could easily be human trafficking or terrorism or photos of political protests. It will be whatever the government doesn't like. Our overlords are taking us down a very dark path. Sincerely, George Orwell

Nah, I’m done with adobe. There’s other options.

Nice script

It's about time.

imagine being soo delusional from what its users want and have used for decades to THINK thery want AI involved in there work hehe is fucking delusional as one can be adobe NOBODY ASKED FOR THIS CRAP WHO besides kids do you think gonna use this AI make a background hehe gonna be some tough years ahead if you keep going down that road you literally destroying photoshop for creatives with your AI crap NOBODY ASKED FOR

Adobe: Copying our data is theft. Copying your data is great.

imagine dominating the creative market with there products and do this kind of crap what a shit show hope its gonna be worst then the bud light effect for the company i have deleted all my adobe apps and surer gonna find another program that can do the same job with my rights intact hehe no Adobe attorney can convince me that they dont fuck with my shit good luck greedy f.....s

Adobe spies on its users Ich nutzte Photoshop seit knapp 30 Jahren (!) und habe Adobe als seriöse Firma eingeschätzt. Das muss ich jetzt revidieren. Adobe macht nichts anderes, als seine treuen (und zahlenden!) Nutzer auszuspionieren. Überdies schreibt Adobe ihnen vor, was sie zu tun und zu lassen haben. Adobe ist aber nicht mein Kindermädchen! Ich möchte mit einem Bildprogramm arbeiten aber mir ganz sicher nicht vorschreiben lassen, was ich damit mache. Schon gar nicht möchte ich, dass meine privaten Bilder von irgendwelchen Hanseln begutachtet oder genutzt werden. Auch nicht von KI! Aktfotographie ist ein legales fotographisches Genre. Auf Aktfotos sind Personen abgebildet, die dem Fotographen (!) für den abgebildeten Körper eine Lizenz gewähren. Diese hat zunächst niemand anzusehen, ausser der Fotograph und das Model. Adobe betreibt mit seinem Ausspionieren die reinste Persönlichkeitsverletzung und greift in intimste Bereiche ein. Man stelle sich mal vor, Makita baut Kameras in ihre Akkuschrauber ein, um zu überprüfen, was man damit macht! Und wenn man etwas macht, was MAKITA nicht gefällt, dann funktioniert der Akkuschrauber nicht mehr. Das ist doch schizophren! Und was machen die ganzen Programme, die nach beenden eines Adobe Programmes immer noch hartnäckig weiterlaufen und ins Internet konnektieren?? Allein das ist ein Grund zu kündigen! Taskkill /IM Photoshop.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM Creative Cloud /T /F Taskkill /IM AdobeNotificationClient.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM AdobeNotificationHelper.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM RuntimeBroker.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM CreativeCloud.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM CCXProcess.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM Adobe Crash Processor.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM CCLibrary.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM CoreSync.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM Creative Cloud Helper.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM AdobeIPCBroker.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM CRWindowsClientService.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM Adobe Desktop Service.exe /T /F Taskkill /IM "Creative Cloud Core Service (32 bit)" /T /F Taskkill /IM AdobeUpdateService.exe /T /F WAS IST DAS ALLES???? Verdammt! Diese Scheisse hat sich zu schliessen, wenn ich nicht mehr mit Photoshop arbeite! YOU DON'T HAVE ACCESS MY CONTENT!!!

This is a tale about how Greed and Trust don't go well together. You may think you got richer, in cash, briefly with your scheme but in truth you have never been so brand poor. Your instincts to communicate through lawyers is however correct, as the predictions show much need for them in your future. What's another unethical company, on a Monday morning, right?

I understand what you said, Adobe. Despite that you got sued by the government, I will still trust you and still renew my subscriptions and account as my professional career since I first became an Adobe user last year, so I can pay the bills. Even with the summary of what you've changed was one big problem. I can't use any of that generative AI stuff like Behance for that crap. I also remembered that you need an additional license from us that can help you make things great. Maybe one day, you will change when things are now used to be a one time purchase. I'll hope that I can still do my work on your software and still believe in you. I'll promise that you will fix this mess and change everything back, Adobe. I'll still like you for now, Adobe.

So they use artworks only submitted by the users? Like isn't it a default option that you have access to it, while the users don't know such is the case and have to search the option to turn it off manually? And what about making PS expensive to the general public and hence making it inaccessible to people who have a lower income? And showing no empathy in that department? And charging for cancellation? 200+ USD? And all this while the terms explicitly say that Adobe can access files under it's terms? Well why does it say that? And starting off saying nothing in the terms have changed but our narrative of this story? Not that all these years they were very exclusive to just people with money. Now they want their customers to think they're empathetic and professional? Very little has changed over the years for an industry leading software that has given very little back. If you guys had RI and EI we wouldn't need AI that is made unfeasible with the public's welfare

Lets all move to AFFINITY🎉

Imagine if downvotes were public. 😅

Way to late. Scam.

You should never gone subscription, now your the perfect model for the public enemy.

I’ve been an Adobe user for many years but ever since you slapped me with your cancellation fee a few years back I will NEVER use your software again.

You can delete my comments because the truth hurts. Only communists and socialist delete comments so I guess we can add that to how terrible of a company you are. I hope you lose in court and lose all your customers. KRITA is free and it DOES NOT STEAL YOUR ARTISTIC WORK.

This is called Adobe Loser.

She looks so miserable

Still canceling and moving to affinity

Huh. That checkbox talking about granting you permission, to use our content, to train your generative AI, just magically disappeared. Strange.

3:05 so… what are your system’s false negatives like? Why does the EULA not protect your customers who have NDAs on their work, providing them indemnity from legal action in the case that your systems misidentify something legal and flag it for human review, revealing something to an Adobe employee who is not legally permitted or entitled to see it? ruclips.net/video/tpbbschYKjE/видео.html

4:23 - you need a license to reproduce so I can copy and paste between Photoshop and Illustrator? Why? That isn’t Adobe doing something, that is me doing it. I commanded it. I hit Ctrl+C Ctrl+V. And it’s happening on MY computer. What we’re concerned about is Adobe doing stuff we haven’t commanded, on some invisible back end service, hidden away from us, that Adobe later claims is ‘just part of the application providing the service’ like, you know, doing some AI training. Your examples are not reassuring, they smack of more deceptive concealment. ‘Like’, ‘such as’, and ‘for example’ are not limiting. The EULA should not be using these vague unlimiting terms, or in all cases should be accompanied by assuringly negative statements. To be fair, you try with stuff like the 4.3A ‘What Adobe Does Not Do’ BUT it then goes and weakens that reassurance by using a ‘like’ - “except at your specific request, like you asking us to train a customised model on your Content” so exactly what constitutes a specific request OTHER than that specific example? Does using a generative fill repair on an image also constitute a ‘specific request’? It is a specific request, and it is it excluded in the terms. Oh, and didn’t you say that the only customer images used would be those in Adobe Stock? But here in the terms it doesn’t say only Adobe Stock images will be scanned. No, it uses ‘at your specific request’ - and Adobe has a track record of using dark patterns to extort those sorts of specific requests (remind me again how Adobe Stock content owners provided their permission for their content in the Adobe Stock library to be used to train Firefly?)

一個不誠實的詐騙集團。

you don’t use customer images to train AI unless they’ve been uploaded to the Stock site? Then, pray tell, what was the Preferences option that got automatically turned on in PS WITHOUT active user permission: “I give Adobe permission to use my images and annotated data to train Adobe’s generative AImodels.” Huh? let’s look at your language… ‘We don’t train Generative AI models on your content’… Do you mean you don’t *right now*? Or ‘have never’? ‘Will never’? Oh, not ‘without permission’. But how will you gather that permission? Let’s see the license say Adobe will never sneak in another automatically ticked box saying “I agree to permit this”, eh? Guarantee it will always be Opt In, never Opt Out? And maybe that a single blanket opt out control will be adequate,rather than the dark pattern of cascading layers where an obscure condition somewhere nullifies all other settings? Like, we can have opted out everywhere, but we get asked by a support person helping us with a problem to try an unreleased bug-fix version and whaddaya know, that was a beta version of the app, that overrides the opt-outs and now all that Behance content is fair game for an AI to be trained. Oh, then i uninstall the beta app? too late, now all my stuff is integrated into the Borg consciousness and cannot be removed because you cannot untrain an AI. 🤮

This is an industry wide problem, not just Adobe. No need to ask them to change anything, just stop using their products, the whole industry will automatically change.